Collaboration in Combating Environmental †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Collaboration in Combating Environmental. Answer: Introduction: Technology and environment are one of the important aspects of the society which are influenced by a number of factors in the society. The globalization of the modern world economy has made it easier for the different parts of the world to spread the technology and the issues related to it. In due time it has become possible for the different people and the society to understand the change in the society due to technology. the technological advancements have caused a great harm to the technology in the long run all the while devising new and better measures to address the problems affecting the environment, giving rise to situation known as the technology-environment paradox management (Narula, 2014). In this context one should also pay heed to the green crime in the society affecting the environment. the green crime is the term explaining the different aspects of the harm done to the environment because of human actions. In the essay the various philosophies relating to the technolo gy environment paradox are also analyzed. The green crime is one of the major issues in the society with the advent and the acceptance of technology as one of the major asset as assisting the growth in the society (Stanley, 2018). the technology environment paradox is one of the major issues that must be assisted by the different factors affecting the technological interventions in the society. The different sociological factors leading to the acceptance of the technology in the normal lives of the people is leading to an issue of causing a number of different environmental problems in the society. Despite the different factors affecting the green crime in the society technology is also used in the modern society to re-establish the ecological balance in the society (Cheng-xiao, 2006). The rising pollution is one of the major issues which is the result of the different technological innovations and the advancements in the modern society. In this context the different technological innovations used in the reestablishment of t he ecological balance by aiding the environment is to be considered. The technology environment paradox is very interrelated to each other and the different aspects of the paradox helps in the mitigating the effects of the green crime in the society. The technology is used to invent a number of things which are not good for the environment and its development such as plastic and then the pollution is mitigated by using a better developed technology to make this product recyclable and use it for the overall sustainable development of the society. one of the most important ways the green crime and the technological innovations can be co-related is the mining industry. The mining process and the re-establishment of the ecological balance of the area after the mining is over is one of the major and important example of the Technology environment paradox in the purview of the green crime in the society. The mining of an area for resource is one of the most important action of mankind which uses the technological innovations and is very important for the sustainable development of the technology in the society today. The mining process of requires deep tunneling process over large areas for a long period of time which greatly affects the ecological biome of the area. This process can be considered a green crime with the use of technology and for the development of technology as it affects the flora and fauna of the area. In most countries after the mining is done a process called the mine site rehabilitation is followed, the mine site rehabilitation is the process, which used the modern technologies for the better restoration of the environment of the area which has been mined along with its flora and fauna. The restoration of the ecological balance of the area using the different technological interventions ascertains the proper restoration of the environmental balance of the areal along which shows the balance of technology and environment on each other. The different philosophies relating to the technology environment paradox management helps in understanding the different issues that the societys perception helps in the acceptance of the technology as an important factor affecting and influencing the different aspects of sustainable development. The different factors affecting the different perspectives of the individuals are based on the different opinions they have about the technology in the society. Technicism is the excessive belief on the benefits of the technology to the society. Technicism is the popular belief system which makes individuals think that they control their entire existence using technology. this accepts green crime as the acceptable cost of development and the technology environment paradox as the costly necessity (Pink White, 2016). Optimism is the general opinion that the technological innovations have a positive impact on the social development. Technological development is opined to be overall good for the sustainable development in the society. in this philosophy the technology environment paradox can be considered ideal for the developed sustainable society and the green crime is tolerated in the lieu of the innovation and development (Williams, Jones Buntting, 2015). Pessimism of technology the opinion where the technology is seen as a barrier and the hinderance to the natural development within a society. the different opinions relating to the various aspects of the pessimism see the technology as threat to the sustainable development as the cognitive development (Webster, 2016). In this opinion the technology environment paradox is favored in the support of environmental development and the green crime is frowned upon as the cause of environmental deterioration. Among the given philosophies optimism has the strongest grounds for the technology environment paradox and the technicism has the weakest. The optimism philosophy can be considered as the strongest support to the given scenarios as it aims towards the acceptance of the positive effects of technology and uses it for the betterment of the overall mankind and the society. In supporting the opinion optimism takes into account the different factors that help in the development of technology and environment in cohesion. Technicism is the weakest opinion in this context as it negates the ill effects of the various green crimes on the environment in favor of technological development. This is considered relatively negative for the different aspects relating to the overall development of the society as it will lead to a number of ill effects on the environment. Technicism is not sustainable for the survival of the human kind and can be considered negative as dependence on it will lead to grad ual downfall of mankind. Therefore, from the above discussion it can be concluded that the different aspects affected by the technology often have an ill effect on the ecological balance of the area. The green crime is of the major issues faced but the society and optimism philosophy along with proper balance between the technology environment paradox is necessary for the survival of the mankind. The sustainable development in the global society of today should focus on the different aspects of the society which will help in its overall development. It is also seen that among other there are a number of different philosophies but adherence to them will harm the mankind as either the environment of the technology will be lost in the long run and both are necessary for human survival. References Cheng-xiao, Z. O. U. (2006). Technology-Environment Paradox" and the Natural Attribute of Technology [J].Science Technology and Dialectics,1. Narula, R. (2014).Globalization and technology: Interdependence, innovation systems and industrial policy. John Wiley Sons. Pink, G., White, R. (2016). Collaboration in Combating Environmental CrimeMaking it Matter. InEnvironmental crime and collaborative state intervention(pp. 3-19). Palgrave Macmillan, London. Stanley, J. (2018). How Propaganda Works, Precis.Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,96(2), 470-474 Webster, M. D. (2016, March). Examining philosophy of technology using grounded theory methods. InForum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research(Vol. 17, No. 2). Williams, P. J., Jones, A., Buntting, C. (Eds.). (2015).The future of technology education. Springer Singapore.